Amount Deposited in the Absence of Requisite SCN is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/amount-deposited-in-the-absence-of-requisite-scn-is-liable-to-be-refunded-cestat/157657/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/amount-deposited-in-the-absence-of-requisite-scn-is-liable-to-be-refunded-cestat/157657/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=CESTAT Top Stories By Jwala K.P – On March 2, 2022 7:34 pm The Principle Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ),New

Builder eligible for Service Tax Refund on Refund to Customers on cancellation of Sale of Flats: CESTAT—TAXSCAN

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/builder-eligible-for-service-tax-refund-on-refund-to-customers-on-cancellation-of-sale-of-flats-cestat/157629/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Builder Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 2, 2022 5:14 pm The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad bench has held that the

Madras HC quashes Prosecution proceedings against Assessee having two PANs where he didn’t use Second PAN for any Transaction–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/madras-hc-quashes-prosecution-proceedings-against-assessee-having-two-pans-where-he-didnt-use-second-pan-for-any-transaction/157815/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/madras-hc-quashes-prosecution-proceedings-against-assessee-having-two-pans-where-he-didnt-use-second-pan-for-any-transaction/157815/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=PAN Top Stories By Abdullah Karuthedakam – On March 3, 2022 12:43 pm The Madras High Court has quashed the Prosecution proceedings against Assessee having

GST Evasion: CBIC cautions against Sharing Aadhaar, PAN Details without Valid Reasons–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-evasion-cbic-cautions-against-sharing-aadhaar-pan-details-without-valid-reasons/158020/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-evasion-cbic-cautions-against-sharing-aadhaar-pan-details-without-valid-reasons/158020/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=CBIC Top Stories By Taxscan Team – On March 3, 2022 8:53 pm The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs ( CBIC ) has

GST Compliance Default: Calcutta HC directs Dept to restore GST Registration within 7 Days

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-compliance-default-calcutta-hc-directs-dept-to-restore-gst-registration-within-7-days/158069/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=GST%20Compliance Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 4, 2022 10:02 am A two-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court, while allowing a writ petition against the order

GST: Input-Output Ratios shall be considered to determine Refund of Unutilized ITC, rules Gujarat HC–TAXSCAN

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-input-output-ratios-shall-be-considered-to-determine-refund-of-unutilized-itc-rules-gujarat-hc/158090/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Input-Output%20Ratios Top Stories By Taxscan Team – On March 4, 2022 11:29 am A two-judge bench of the Gujarat High Court consisting Justice J.B.Pardiwala and Justice Nisha M.Thakore has

GST Dept cannot ignore effects of Technical Glitches in GSTN: Gujarat HC allows Manual filing of GSTR-6–TAXSCAN

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-dept-cannot-ignore-effects-of-technical-glitches-in-gstn-gujarat-hc-allows-manual-filing-of-gstr-6/158153/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=GSTR-6 Top Stories By Jwala K.P – On March 4, 2022 1:48 pm The Gujarat High Court held that the department cannot raise their hands in despair

Bombay High Court directs GST Department to issue Norms for Issuance of Summons during Investigations

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/bombay-high-court-directs-gst-department-to-issue-norms-for-issuance-of-summons-during-investigations/156727/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Summons Top Stories By Abdullah Karuthedakam – On February 26, 2022 1:45 pm The division bench of Justice R D Dhanuka and Justice S M Modak of

1 57 58 59 60 61 190