Expenses towards Gifts purchased for Sales Promotion allowable as Income Tax Deduction Even If List of Recipients are not provided: ITAT–TAXSCAN

lipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/expenses-towards-gifts-purchased-for-sales-promotion-allowable-as-income-tax-deduction-even-if-list-of-recipients-are-not-provided-itat/163215/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=gift Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 23, 2022 7:20 am The Ahmedabad bench of the ITAT has held that the expenses towards gifts purchased

Service Tax Demand cannot be based on Statement recorded u/s 132 of Income Tax Act: CESTAT–TAXSCAN

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/service-tax-demand-cannot-be-based-on-statement-recorded-u-s-132-of-income-tax-act-cestat/162293/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Service%20Tax%20Demand Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 21, 2022 6:03 am While quashing a service tax demand, the CESTAT, Ahmedabad bench has held that the

Income Tax Practitioner misled Assessee in making False Refund: ITAT deletes Penalty against Assessee [Read Order]–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/income-tax-practitioner-misled-assessee-in-making-false-refund-itat-deletes-penalty-against-assessee/162053/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/income-tax-practitioner-misled-assessee-in-making-false-refund-itat-deletes-penalty-against-assessee/162053/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Income%20Tax%20Practitioner Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 18, 2022 6:16 pm The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai bench has deleted penalty under

Period of Limitation for GST Appeal suspended from 15.3.2020 to 14.3.2020: Allahabad HC directs Appellate Authority to re-consider Appeal

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/period-of-limitation-for-gst-appeal-suspended-from-15-3-2020-to-14-3-2020-allahabad-hc-directs-appellate-authority-to-re-consider-appeal/161707/ Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 17, 2022 7:04 pm The Allahabad High Court has held that while considering the fact that the period

Interest from Loan given to related party for Business purpose does not attract section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/interest-from-loan-given-to-related-party-for-business-purpose-does-not-attract-section-40a2b-of-the-income-tax-act-itat/159672/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/interest-from-loan-given-to-related-party-for-business-purpose-does-not-attract-section-40a2b-of-the-income-tax-act-itat/159672/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Interest Top Stories By Rasheela Basheer – On March 10, 2022 11:22 pm The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the

A Director not involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company cannot be Prosecuted for Cheque Bounce Cases: Allahabad HC [Read Order]–TAXSCAN

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/a-director-not-involved-in-day-to-day-affairs-of-company-cannot-be-prosecuted-for-cheque-bounce-cases-allahabad-hc/159879/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/a-director-not-involved-in-day-to-day-affairs-of-company-cannot-be-prosecuted-for-cheque-bounce-cases-allahabad-hc/159879/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Cheque%20Bounce%20Cases Top Stories By Taxscan Team – On March 11, 2022 3:08 pm The Allahabad High Court has held that a director, who is not

1 37 38 39 40 41 213