Relief to Mahindra and Mahindra: ITAT directs AO to delete Disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/relief-to-mahindra-and-mahindra-itat-directs-ao-to-delete-disallowance-made-u-s-40aia-of-income-tax-act/236174/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Relief%20to%20Mahindra By Kalyani B Nair – On December 20, 2022 2:07 pm In a major relief to Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, the appellant, the Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax

Proceedings u/s 153C of Income Tax Act in absence of any Incriminating Material is Bad in Law: ITAT

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/proceedings-u-s-153c-of-income-tax-act-in-absence-of-any-incriminating-material-is-bad-in-law-itat/236156/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Proceedings By Kalyani B Nair – On December 20, 2022 2:35 pm The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench held that Proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax

Repairs and Maintenance Expenditure in Rented Showroom and Workshop amounts to Revenue Expenditure, can allow Disallowance u/s 30 (a ) (i): ITAT

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/repairs-and-maintenance-expenditure-in-rented-showroom-and-workshop-amounts-to-revenue-expenditure-can-allow-disallowance-u-s-30a-i-itat/235710/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Repairs%20and%20Maintenance By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 20, 2022 10:17 am The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that repairs and maintenance expenditure

Addition u/s 68 based on Cash Deposit not allowable in the Absence of Corroborative Evidence: ITAT

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/addition-u-s-68-based-on-cash-deposit-not-allowable-in-the-absence-of-corroborative-evidence-itat/235716/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Addition%20u/s%2068 By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 20, 2022 10:44 am The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) has held that addition under section  68 of the

Insurance Premium for paid for Keyman Insurance Policy of LIC, allowable as Expenses: ITAT

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/insurance-premium-for-paid-for-keyman-insurance-policy-of-lic-allowable-as-expenses-itat/234224/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Insurance%20Premium By Kalyani B Nair – On December 15, 2022 3:33 pm The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that Insurance Premium for paid for

Reasons recorded for Reassessment cannot be Substituted, Added or Deleted: ITAT

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reasons-recorded-for-reassessment-cannot-be-substituted-added-or-deleted-itat/217482/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Reasons%20recorded%20for%20Reassessment By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 12, 2022 5:40 pm The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the reasons recorded for

Benefit of CBDT Circular providing Ceiling on Holding of Jewellery can be Extended to Jewellery held by Minor Son and Daughter: ITAT [Read Order]

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/benefit-of-cbdt-circular-providing-ceiling-on-holding-of-jewellery-can-be-extended-to-jewellery-held-by-minor-son-and-daughter-itat/233868/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/benefit-of-cbdt-circular-providing-ceiling-on-holding-of-jewellery-can-be-extended-to-jewellery-held-by-minor-son-and-daughter-itat/233868/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Benefit%20of%20CBDT%20Circular By Rasheela Basheer – On December 14, 2022 5:04 pm The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the benefit of the circular

Joint Commissioner sanctioned Re-open Notice u/s 148 after expiry of 4 yrs: ITAT quashes Assessment Order being Violative Sec 151

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/joint-commissioner-sanctioned-re-open-notice-u-s-148-after-expiry-of-4-yrs-itat-quashes-assessment-order-being-violative-sec-151/193782/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Joint%20Commissioner%20sanctioned By Taxscan Team – On December 14, 2022 5:37 pm The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Ahmedabad Bench has held that Joint Commissioner sanctioned reopening notice

Condition of Proving ‘Source of Source of Funds’ under 68 not applicable to Non-Residents: ITAT deletes Income Addition*

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/condition-of-proving-source-of-source-of-funds-under-68-not-applicable-to-non-residents-itat-deletes-income-tax-addition/233842/ By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 14, 2022 5:40 pm The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the condition of proving “source of

Order passed without considering objection filed by petitioner against Notice u/s 148A(b) not valid: Calcutta HC–TAXSCAN

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/order-passed-without-considering-objection-filed-by-petitioner-against-notice-u-s-148ab-not-valid-calcutta-hc/231671/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Order%20passed By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 7, 2022 11:25 am In its recent order, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has held that the order passed

Calcutta High Court (HC) has held that the order passed without considering the objection filed by the petitioner against notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is not valid.

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/order-passed-without-considering-objection-filed-by-petitioner-against-notice-u-s-148ab-not-valid-calcutta-hc/231671/ By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 7, 2022 11:25 am In its recent order, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has held that the order passed

Order passed without considering objection filed by petitioner against Notice u/s 148A(b) not valid: Calcutta HC

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/order-passed-without-considering-objection-filed-by-petitioner-against-notice-u-s-148ab-not-valid-calcutta-hc/231671/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Order%20passed By Yogitha S. Yogesh – On December 7, 2022 11:25 am In its recent order, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has held that the order passed

1 16 17 18 19 20 23