Supreme Court Revisits The Requirements For Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence Under Section 65b Of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration – India

Clipped from: https://www.mondaq.com/india/trials-appeals-compensation/988004/supreme-court-revisits-the-requirements-for-admissibility-of-electronic-evidence-under-section-65b-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872 Recently, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat and V. Ramasubramanian, vide judgment dated July

CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand wrongly confirmed under ‘Banking and Financial Services’ when service rendered was under ‘Construction of Complexes’

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/cestat-quashes-service-tax-demand-wrongly-confirmed-under-banking-and-financial-services-when-service-rendered-was-under-construction-of-complexes-read-order/106284/ The Customs, Excises, Service Taxes Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench said that Service Tax demand wrongly confirmed under “Banking and Financial Services” when service rendered

1 9 10 11