Category: Seven Star

These would be cases where the return is accepted without scrutiny and no formal assessment is made.9 A perusal of the provisions clearly shows that

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/qna-can-i-claim-income-tax-benefits-on-selling-gifted-jewellery-key-questions-on-gift-taxation-in-india-answered/463841/ A: Gifts from relatives are exempted from Tax in India. It is defined under section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act. Gifts from

Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/analysis-section-455a-income-tax-act-1961.html SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR COMPUTATION OF CAPITAL GAINS IN CASE OF JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [Section 45(5A)] Sub-section (5A) was inserted in section 45 with

Clipped from: https://database.taxsutra.com/articles/eceb7adb222b44360f06df5b8b5aa6/expert_article The assessment proceedings, completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“Act”), have to be conferred sanctity and any reopening of the

Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-u-s-147-void-ab-initio-issue-dealt-original-assessment.html DCIT Vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 on the issue which is already dealt

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reassessment-based-on-insight-portal-information-must-be-u-s-147-148-not-section-153c-delhi-hc-read-order/462724/ In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ruled that reassessment was initiated based on insight portal information so it must be under

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/validity-reopening-assessment-beyond-four-year-limitation-period-hinges-assessees-full-disclosure.html Prime Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening of assessment beyond four-year limitation period invalid if AO fails to establish failure on the part of

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mere-change-opinion-ground-reopening-assessment.html Konark Life Spaces Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Konark Life Spaces v. Assistant Commissioner of Income -Tax and Ors.

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-addition-grounds-re-opening-assessment.html PCIT CENTRAL -1 Vs Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court) In PCIT CENTRAL-1 Vs Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt Ltd, the Delhi

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/absence-faceless-assessment-invalidates-section-148-notice-ph-hc.html Vipin Kumar Gupta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in the case of Vipin Kumar Gupta vs. ITO,

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-u-s-147-void-ab-initio-issue-dealt-original-assessment.html DCIT Vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 on the issue which is already dealt in

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-4-years-valid-assessee-full-true-disclosure-original-assessment.html Ranjana Aggarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) When the original assessment is completed u/s 143(3) and the reassessment proceedings have been initiated after a period

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-order-quashed-mandatory-requirement-notice-u-s-143-2-complied.html Anand Sawroop Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT Chandigarh held that reassessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act cannot be passed without

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/calcutta-hc-stays-section-148-notice-anup-kumar-case.html Anup Kumar Agarwal Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) In the case of Anup Kumar Agarwal Vs. Union of India & Ors., the

https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajasthan-hc-quashes-reassessment-order-in-search-case.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajasthan-hc-quashes-reassessment-order-in-search-case.html Shiv Vegpro Private Limited Vs Deputy / Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Rajasthan High Court) In the case of Shiv Vegpro Private Limited