Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/notices-for-appeal-sent-to-incorrect-email-id-itat-restores-matter-to-cita/468695/ The ITAT decided to restore the appeal for a fresh hearing, instructing the CIT(A) to issue notices to the correct email address By Sneha
Category: Seven Star
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reopening bad-in-law since AO unaware about exact nature of income which escaped assessment
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html ITO Vs Magnetic Properties Exim Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that in case of reopening of assessment AO needs to have
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 based on material found during search invalid: ITAT Delhi
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/initiation-proceedings-u-s-148-based-material-search-invalid-itat-delhi.html Sheel Trading Company Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that based on incriminating materials unearthed during the course of search, proceedings under
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reopening bad-in-law since AO unaware about exact nature of income which escaped assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html ITO Vs Magnetic Properties Exim Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that in case of reopening of assessment AO needs to
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Adoption of section 50C justified on difference in sale consideration in sale deed and stamp value adopted by officer
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adoption-section-50c-justified-difference-sale-consideration-sale-deed-stamp-adopted-officer.html Ranganath Ashok Meharwade Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that once the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed differs from the
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Disallowance of deduction u/s. 54F merely due to delay in completion of construction not justifiable
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/disallowance-deduction-u-s-54f-due-delay-completion-construction-justifiable.html Kothari Sanjay Manilal Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that delay in the completion of construction of the house will not be
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Income Tax: What is Section 148A notice and what are the new changes brought under Budget 2024? – BusinessToday
Clipped from: https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/income-tax-what-is-section-148a-notice-and-what-are-the-new-changes-brought-under-budget-2024-441068-2024-08-11 Section 148A of the Income Tax Act allows the Income Tax officers to initiate reassessment proceedings when they suspect that a taxpayer may
2👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Notice issued u/s. 148 after period of six years for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation: ITAT Mumbai
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/notice-issued-u-s148-period-years-ay-2015-16-barred-limitation-itat-mumbai.html?form=MG0AV3 ACIT Vs Manish Financial (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that validity of notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Decoding Tax Dynamics: Unravelling Legal Complexities in Income Tax Reassessment Notices under Section 148, IT Act Post-Finance Act, 2021 | SCC Times
Clipped from: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/05/15/decoding-tax-dynamics-unravelling-legal-complexities-in-income-tax-reassessment-notices-under-section-148-it-act-post-finance-act-2021/#fn16 Introduction The landscape of the Income Tax Act of 19611 underwent a substantial transformation with the implementation of the Finance Act, 2021 (FA)2, bringing about significant revisions
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Indexation benefit admissible even in respect of assets held in foreign countries: ITAT Mumbai
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/indexation-benefit-admissible-respect-assets-held-foreign-countries-itat-mumbai.html DCIT Vs Aarav Fragrances and Flavors Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that benefit of cost inflation index admissible as per second
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Denial of capital gain exemption u/s 54F for property described in registered sale deed as “Makaan” was justified as having Brick-Kiln construction
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/denial-capital-gain-exemption-u-s-54f-property-registered-sale-deed-makaan-justified-brick-kiln-construction.html Himanshu Garg VS ACIT (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: Tribunal was justified in declining capital gain exemption under Section 54F with respect to a property
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍CIT(A) failed to examine the validity of jurisdiction u/s. 148 hence matter remanded: ITAT Delhi
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/citafailed-examine-validity-jurisdiction-u-s-148-matter-remanded-itat-delhi.html Trinity Touch Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi remanded the matter back to CIT(A) since CIT(A) failed to examined the validity
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Fair market value on area allotted under occupancy certificated accepted: ITAT Bangalore
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fair-market-area-allotted-occupancy-certificated-accepted-itat-bangalore.html ITO Vs Govindappa Jayaram Doddiah (HUF) (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that CIT(A) rightly accepted the fair market value on the area allotted
2👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Notice issued u/s. 148 after period of six years for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation: ITAT Mumbai
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/notice-issued-u-s148-period-years-ay-2015-16-barred-limitation-itat-mumbai.html ACIT Vs Manish Financial (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that validity of notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍ITAT Jodhpur: Crypto Gains Taxed as LTCG, Allows Section 54F deduction
lipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-jodhpur-crypto-gains-taxed-ltcg-allows-section-54f-deduction.html Raunaq Prakash Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) In the case of Raunaq Prakash Jain vs. ITO, the ITAT Jodhpur addressed the taxation of cryptocurrency
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Exemption u/s. 54F admissible in respect of only one residential property: Delhi HC
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/exemption-u-s-54f-admissible-respect-residential-property-delhi-hc.html Kamla Ajmera Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that in case of investment in two residential properties, exemption under section
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍The legal gaps in India’s unregulated AI surveillance – The Hindu
Clipped from: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/the-legal-gaps-in-indias-unregulated-ai-surveillance/article68996389.ece There needs to be a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses AI’s implications for civil liberties In 2019, the Indian government made headlines by
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌The new RBI should revert to old rupee policy to address challenges | Economy & Policy News – Business Standard
Clipped from: https://www.business-standard.com/economy/news/the-new-rbi-should-revert-to-old-rupee-policy-to-address-challenges-124121700031_1.html In our earlier piece in these pages, we highlighted the unwelcome consequences of the exchange rate policy adopted under the outgoing Reserve Bank
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Punjab & Haryana HC sets aside order Income Tax SCN issued without following procedure u/s 144 B
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/income-tax-scn-issued-without-following-procedure-u-s-144-b-punjab-haryana-hc-sets-aside-order/466206/ The bench set aside the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and all consequential
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Delhi HC Rules Reassessment Based on Insight Portal Information Must Be u/s 147/148, Not Section 153C
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reassessment-based-on-insight-portal-information-must-be-u-s-147-148-not-section-153c-delhi-hc-read-order/462724/ In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ruled that reassessment was initiated based on insight portal information so it must be under