https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gain-exemption-section-54f-investment-multiple-units.html The Capital Gain Tax provisions under the Income Tax Act are not very comprehensive, often leaving taxpayers uncertain about their application. The lack of
Category: Seven Star
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reasons disclosed to assessee for reassessment u/s. 148 cannot be improved subsequently: Delhi HC
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reasons-disclosed-assessee-reassessment-u-s-148-improved-subsequently-delhi-hc.html Subhash Chander Dabas Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that validity of reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Application of Section 147 of Income Tax Act by AO having Tangible Material in Possession indicating Escapement of Income Chargeable to Tax is Valid: ITAT
lipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/application-of-section-147-of-income-tax-act-by-ao-having-tangible-material-in-possession-indicating-escapement-of-income-chargeable-to-tax-is-valid-itat/322680/ The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the application of Section 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961, by an
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍No Assessment Order shall be passed u/s 153C of Income Tax Act when Seized documents did not establish any correlation with that Assessment Year :ITAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/no-assessment-order-shall-be-passed-u-s-153c-of-income-tax-act-when-seized-documents-did-not-establish-any-correlation-with-that-assessment-year-itat/322122/ The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi bench held that no assessment order should be passed under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when seized
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reopening of Assessment. u/s 147 of Income Tax Act not Valid in Absence of an Allegation Failure to Disclose Material Fact: Delhi HC
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reopening-of-assessment-u-s-147-of-income-tax-act-not-valid-in-absence-of-an-allegation-failure-to-disclose-material-fact-delhi-hc/302460/ The Delhi High Court has held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not valid in
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍ITAT Remands CIT(A)’s Addition Matter for Ignoring NRI’s 50% Property Ownership Claim
lipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/cita-makes-addition-without-considering-nris-only-50-ownership-claim-in-property-itat-remands-matter-for-proper-hearing/469648/ Considering CIT(A) made an addition ignoring the assessee’s 50% property ownership, the ITAT remanded the matter for fresh consideration By Kavi Priya – On December 23,
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Assessee not expected to keep E-Portal of Income Tax Dept Open all time to have Knowledge of what is being Done: Punjab and Haryana HC
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/assessee-not-expected-to-keep-e-portal-of-income-tax-dept-open-all-time-to-have-knowledge-of-what-is-being-done-punjab-and-haryana-hc-read-order/390764/ Individual or an Assessee not expected to keep e-portal of Income Tax Dept open all time to have knowledge of what is being
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Annual Tax Cases Digest 2024: Supreme Court and High Court
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/annual-digest-supreme-court-and-high-court-cases-on-taxation-part-16/468447/ This annual round-up analytically summarizes the key Direct and Indirect Tax Judgments of the Supreme Court and all High Courts of India reported
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Income Tax tribunal paves way for double deduction claims – The Hindu BusinessLine
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-laws/income-tax-tribunal-paves-way-for-double-deduction-claims/article68557951.ece Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allows simultaneous deduction claims under Section 54 and 54F in Ramdas Sitaram Patil vs ACIT case In Ramdas Sitaram Patil vs
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍The Reassessment Maze – Budget 2024 Proposals
Clipped from: https://database.taxsutra.com/articles/d271ed6f303e1b59d7025ff6df08a5/expert_article Background Re-assessment provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were significantly modified by the Finance Act 2021, effective from 1 April
आवश्यक 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍2024 Amendments to Income-tax Reassessment Procedures.
Clipped from: https://www.metalegal.in/post/2024-amendments-to-income-tax-reassessment-procedures Introduction The reassessment provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘IT Act’) have been a focal point of legislative reform and judicial scrutiny. The
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) Over Incorrect Email Notices
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/notices-for-appeal-sent-to-incorrect-email-id-itat-restores-matter-to-cita/468695/ The ITAT decided to restore the appeal for a fresh hearing, instructing the CIT(A) to issue notices to the correct email address By Sneha
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reopening bad-in-law since AO unaware about exact nature of income which escaped assessment
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html ITO Vs Magnetic Properties Exim Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that in case of reopening of assessment AO needs to have
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 based on material found during search invalid: ITAT Delhi
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/initiation-proceedings-u-s-148-based-material-search-invalid-itat-delhi.html Sheel Trading Company Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that based on incriminating materials unearthed during the course of search, proceedings under
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Reopening bad-in-law since AO unaware about exact nature of income which escaped assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-bad-in-law-ao-unaware-exact-nature-income-escaped-assessment.html ITO Vs Magnetic Properties Exim Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that in case of reopening of assessment AO needs to
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Adoption of section 50C justified on difference in sale consideration in sale deed and stamp value adopted by officer
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adoption-section-50c-justified-difference-sale-consideration-sale-deed-stamp-adopted-officer.html Ranganath Ashok Meharwade Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that once the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed differs from the
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Disallowance of deduction u/s. 54F merely due to delay in completion of construction not justifiable
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/disallowance-deduction-u-s-54f-due-delay-completion-construction-justifiable.html Kothari Sanjay Manilal Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that delay in the completion of construction of the house will not be
1👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Income Tax: What is Section 148A notice and what are the new changes brought under Budget 2024? – BusinessToday
Clipped from: https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/income-tax-what-is-section-148a-notice-and-what-are-the-new-changes-brought-under-budget-2024-441068-2024-08-11 Section 148A of the Income Tax Act allows the Income Tax officers to initiate reassessment proceedings when they suspect that a taxpayer may
2👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Notice issued u/s. 148 after period of six years for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation: ITAT Mumbai
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/notice-issued-u-s148-period-years-ay-2015-16-barred-limitation-itat-mumbai.html?form=MG0AV3 ACIT Vs Manish Financial (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that validity of notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for