https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/personal-hearing-mandatory-adverse-orders-gst-bombay-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/personal-hearing-mandatory-adverse-orders-gst-bombay-hc.html Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court in the
Category: Service Tax
👍👍👍CESTAT Weekly Round-Up
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/cestat-weekly-round-up-91/373576/ This weekly round-up analytically summarizes the key stories of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) reported at taxscan.in,
👍👍👍👍👍No Service Tax on Cutting Plates/Coils Job-Work: Considered as Manufacturing
https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-cutting-plates-coils-job-work-considered-manufacturing.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-cutting-plates-coils-job-work-considered-manufacturing.html R.S.D. Steel Industries Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh) n a significant ruling, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Service Tax cannot be Demanded on Sole basis of Information from ITR and Form 26AS: CESTAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/service-tax-cannot-be-demanded-on-sole-basis-of-information-from-itr-and-form-26as-cestat-read-order/380190/ Service tax cannot be demanded on sole basis of information from ITR and Form 26AS, rules CESTAT By Kalyani B. Nair – On March 5, 2024
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍GST Officer Ignores Taxpayer’s Reply – Delhi HC Orders Re-adjudication
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-officer-ignores-taxpayers-reply-delhi-hc-orders-re-adjudication.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-officer-ignores-taxpayers-reply-delhi-hc-orders-re-adjudication.html Arrow Aircraft Sales and Charters Private Limited Vs Sales Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) Introduction: In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Service tax demands cannot be imposed solely on ITR/26AS statements: CESTAT Hyderabad
https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demands-imposed-solely-itr-26as-statements-cestat-hyderabad.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demands-imposed-solely-itr-26as-statements-cestat-hyderabad.html Gopi Chenna Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Medchal – GST (CESTAT Hyderabad) Introduction: The CESTAT Hyderabad recently passed a crucial order on two
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Failure to Respond on SCN due to Missing Receipt of Notice from GST Portal: Delhi HC directs Re Adjudication
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/failure-to-respond-on-scn-due-to-missing-receipt-of-notice-from-gst-portal-delhi-hc-directs-re-adjudication/378126/ The Delhi High Court directed re-adjudication as the failure to respond to Show Cause Notice ( SCN ) was due to a missing
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Delhi HC Sets Aside Order Due to GST SCN sent on wrong Email Address
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-due-gst-scn-sent-wrong-email-address.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-due-gst-scn-sent-wrong-email-address.html Babaji Bags A Proprietary Firm Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has overturned
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Service Tax demand merely on Form 26AS Not Sustainable: CESTAT Kolkata
https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-form-26as-sustainable-cestat-kolkata.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-form-26as-sustainable-cestat-kolkata.html Rishu Enterprise Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) Introduction: The case of Rishu Enterprise vs. Commissioner of CGST & Excise, heard
GST department obligated to provide hearing if adverse decision contemplated
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-department-obligated-provide-hearing-adverse-decision-contemplated.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-department-obligated-provide-hearing-adverse-decision-contemplated.html Primeone Work Force Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) 1. Introduction: The Allahabad High Court, in response to four writ
Income Tax Notice Invalid if not mailed on Registered Email ID: Karnataka HC
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-notice-invalid-not-mailed-registered-email-id-karnataka-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-notice-invalid-not-mailed-registered-email-id-karnataka-hc.html Sterling Urban Ventures Private Limited Vs Assessment Unit (Karnataka High Court) Introduction: The recent case of Sterling Urban Ventures Private Limited Vs Assessment
Provisional attachment of bank account u/s. 83 of CGST Act based on tangible material valid
Read more at: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provisional-attachment-bank-account-u-s-83-cgst-act-based-tangible-material-valid.html#google_vignetteCopyright © Taxguru.in https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provisional-attachment-bank-account-u-s-83-cgst-act-based-tangible-material-valid.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provisional-attachment-bank-account-u-s-83-cgst-act-based-tangible-material-valid.html Arramva Corporation & Ors. Vs Additional Director General & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court held
Show Cause Notices (SCN) under GST: Procedures, Judgments & Implications
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/show-cause-notices-gst-procedures-judgments-implications.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/show-cause-notices-gst-procedures-judgments-implications.html Navigating the intricacies of Show Cause Notices (SCN) under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime is crucial for businesses. This presentation
Opportunity of personal hearing u/s 75(4) of GST Act mandatory even if not opted by assessee
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/opportunity-of-personal-hearing-u-s-75-4-of-gst-act-was-mandatory-even-if-otherwise-not-opted-by-assessee.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/opportunity-of-personal-hearing-u-s-75-4-of-gst-act-was-mandatory-even-if-otherwise-not-opted-by-assessee.html Gabriel India Limited Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Since it was mandatory on the part of the respondents to provide
RBI to offer higher amount to banks at VRR auction on Dec 22 – The Hindu BusinessLine
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/rbi-to-offer-higher-amount-to-banks-at-vrr-auction-on-dec-22/article67662556.ece Clipped from: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/rbi-to-offer-higher-amount-to-banks-at-vrr-auction-on-dec-22/article67662556.ece The central bank has increased the amount to ₹1.75-lakh crore against ₹1-lakh crore offered last week The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stepped
Personal Hearing Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act, even if otherwise opted for: Madras HC
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/personal-hearing-mandatory-u-s-754-of-gst-act-even-if-otherwise-opted-for-madras-hc-read-order/354319/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Personal%20Hearing%20Mandatory%20u/s%2075(4)%20of%20GST%20Act,%20even%20if%20otherwise%20opted%20for:%20Madras%20HC The Madras High Court observed that personal hearing is mandatory under Section 75 (4) of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, even
No Penalty if no inaccurate Reporting and no Concealment by Assessee
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-inaccurate-reporting-concealment-assessee.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-inaccurate-reporting-concealment-assessee.html CIT Vs Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd (Delhi High Court) Introduction: The recent decision by the Delhi High Court in the case of
Non-Consideration of Reply Violates Natural Justice; HC Grants Opportunity of Hearing
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-non-consideration-reply-violates-natural-justice-hc-grants-opportunity-hearing.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-non-consideration-reply-violates-natural-justice-hc-grants-opportunity-hearing.html Daksh Enterprise Vs Commissioner Of State Tax (Gujarat High Court) Introduction: In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court addressed a critical issue
Service Tax Demand based on Form 26 AS from Income Tax Dept without Investigation is Invalid: CESTAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/service-tax-demand-based-on-form-26-as-from-income-tax-dept-without-investigation-is-invalid-cestat/342057/ The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) has held that service tax demand based on Form 26 AS from the
Service Tax Demand without Specification of Service Category in SCN : CESTAT Quashes Demand
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/service-tax-demand-without-specification-of-service-category-in-scn-cestat-quashes-demand/343818/ The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the service tax demand which does not specify the service category
aniltikotekar4sme.com 