https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-demand-period-unsustainable-tax-evasion-intent.html lipped from: https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-demand-period-unsustainable-tax-evasion-intent.html Kanoria Energy & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) Summary: In the case of Kanoria Energy & Infrastructure Ltd.
Category: Service Tax
👌👌👌The Rajasthan High Court has recently held that an assessee’s admission cannot be treated as conclusive evidence for income tax additions in the absence of corroborating material.
lipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/assessees-admission-not-a-valid-ground-for-income-tax-addition-rajasthan-hc/437752/ The Rajasthan High Court has recently held that an assessee’s admission cannot be treated as conclusive evidence for income tax additions in the
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Service of notice gets affected when sent to correct address by registered post
https://taxguru.in/company-law/service-notice-gets-affected-sent-correct-address-registered-post.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/company-law/service-notice-gets-affected-sent-correct-address-registered-post.html Mukund Rajhans Vs Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi) In the case of Mukund Rajhans vs. Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited, the National Company
👍👍👍👍👍Delhi HC Invalidates GST Order for Lack of Consideration of Petitioner’s Reply
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-invalidates-gst-order-lack-of-consideration-petitioners-reply.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-invalidates-gst-order-lack-of-consideration-petitioners-reply.html RPJ Polymers Vs Union Of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) RPJ Polymers, the petitioner, challenged an order dated 28.12.2023 issued under
👍👍👍👍👍Improper service of Section 148 notice renders assessment order invalid
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/improper-service-section-148-notice-renders-assessment-order-invalid.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/improper-service-section-148-notice-renders-assessment-order-invalid.html Mandeep Malli Vs ACIT (ITAT Amritsar) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Amritsar presided over the case of Mandeep Malli vs. ACIT,
👍👍👍👍👍GST Assessment Order Invalid if Reply to Notice Ignored: Madras HC
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-invalid-reply-notice-ignored-madras-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-invalid-reply-notice-ignored-madras-hc.html Imperial Shipping Service Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has set aside a
Issuance of second SCN without adjudicating first is jurisdictionally void: CESTAT Mumbai
https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/issuance-second-scn-adjudicating-first-jurisdictionally-void-cestat-mumbai.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/issuance-second-scn-adjudicating-first-jurisdictionally-void-cestat-mumbai.html Saf Yesat Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) The case between Saf Yesat Company Pvt. Ltd. and the
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Assessment Based on Mere Unverified Third Party Statement Bad in Law: ITAT Mumbai
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/assessment-based-unverified-third-party-statement-bad-law-itat-mumbai.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/assessment-based-unverified-third-party-statement-bad-law-itat-mumbai.html Kundal Raghubir Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai reviewed an appeal filed by
👍👍👍👍👍Madras HC Quashes GST Assessment Orders: Taxpayer’s Interim Reply Ignored
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-quashes-gst-assessment-orders-taxpayer-interim-reply.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-quashes-gst-assessment-orders-taxpayer-interim-reply.html Madhava Steels Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) Inspection (Madras High Court) In a significant legal development, the Madras High Court recently rendered a
👍👍👍GST Proper Officer’s Disregard for Taxpayer’s Reply ex-facie Shows Non-application of Mind: Delhi HC sets aside Demand Order
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-proper-officers-disregard-for-taxpayers-reply-ex-facie-shows-non-application-of-mind-delhi-hc-sets-aside-demand-order-read-order/397485/ In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court overturned a demand order, citing the failure of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) proper
👍👍👍👍👍Service Tax Demand Without Proof, based on ST-3 Returns vs. Trial Balance differences unjustified
https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-proof-based-st-3-returns-vs-trial-balance-differences-unjustified.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-proof-based-st-3-returns-vs-trial-balance-differences-unjustified.html South Eastern Coalfields Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) The Tribunal emphasized that service tax can only
SCN and GST Demand Order issued on same Date: Madras HC sets aside Order, Directs to Initiate Proceedings in accordance with Law
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/scn-and-gst-demand-order-issued-on-same-date-madras-hc-sets-aside-order-directs-to-initiate-proceedings-in-accordance-with-law-read-order/396973/ The Madras High Court sets aside the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order issued on the same date of issuance
👍👍👍👍👍GST: Non-Attendance at Personal Hearing Doesn’t Invalidate Reply
Read more at: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-non-attendance-personal-hearing-invalidate-reply.htmlCopyright © Taxguru.in https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-non-attendance-personal-hearing-invalidate-reply.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-non-attendance-personal-hearing-invalidate-reply.html Tokyo Zairyo (India) Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court) Reply cannot be disregarded merely for
No consideration, no tax – The Hindu BusinessLine
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-laws/no-consideration-no-tax/article68036060.ece Clipped from: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-laws/no-consideration-no-tax/article68036060.ece If a service is rendered, but no consideration is received, service tax cannot be charged, according to the Customs, Excise and Service
👍👍👍👍👍tax notice: Keep taxpayers in the loop before you act: Court to Income Tax dept – The Economic Times
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/keep-taxpayers-in-the-loop-before-you-act-court-to-income-tax-dept/articleshow/109098291.cms Clipped from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/keep-taxpayers-in-the-loop-before-you-act-court-to-income-tax-dept/articleshow/109098291.cms Synopsis Quashing a November 2022 show-cause notice against Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, The Punjab and Haryana High Court said
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Service Tax not leviable Merely on Basis of Figures Reflected in Statutory Records: CESTAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/service-tax-not-leviable-merely-on-basis-of-figures-reflected-in-statutory-records-cestat-read-order/385487/ Service tax not leviable merely on basis of figures reflected in statutory records, rules CESTAT By Kalyani B. Nair – On March 22, 2024 2:12 pm –
👍👍👍👍👍Extended Limitation Period Inapplicable without Intent to evade Service Tax
https://taxguru.in/service-tax/extended-limitation-period-inapplicable-intent-evade-service-tax.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/extended-limitation-period-inapplicable-intent-evade-service-tax.html Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs Joint Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) In the case between Rajasthan State
👍👍👍👍GST Officer Must Evaluate Reply’s Merits Before Deciding on Sufficiency: Delhi HC
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-officer-evaluate-replys-merits-deciding-sufficiency-delhi-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-officer-evaluate-replys-merits-deciding-sufficiency-delhi-hc.html CA Sandeep Kanoi 10 Mar 2024 1,218 Views 0 comment Print Goods and Services Tax | Judiciary Case Law Details Case Name : EMCO Cables (India) Private Limited Vs Union
👍👍👍👍👍Entire proceedings without mandatory pre-SCN consultation unsustainable: Jharkhand HC
https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/entire-proceedings-mandatory-pre-show-notice-consultation-unsustainable-jharkhand-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/entire-proceedings-mandatory-pre-show-notice-consultation-unsustainable-jharkhand-hc.html POONAM GANDHI 11 Mar 2024 144 Views 0 comment Print Custom Duty | Judiciary Case Law Details Case Name : Bihar Foundry & Appeal Number : Castings Ltd. Vs Union
👍👍👍Personal Hearing Mandatory for Adverse Orders under GST: Bombay HC
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/personal-hearing-mandatory-adverse-orders-gst-bombay-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/personal-hearing-mandatory-adverse-orders-gst-bombay-hc.html Mauli Sai Developers Private Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court in the
aniltikotekar4sme.com 