Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/illiterate-assessee-running-mobile-shop-fails-to-comply-with-income-tax-notice-itat-imposes-fine-read-order/466009/ Illiterate Assessee Running Mobile Shop fails to Comply with Income Tax Notice: ITAT imposes Fine [Read Order] The assessee filed an appeal late,
Category: Income Tax
👌👌👌Advance tax payment: What happens if you fail to pay tax on December 15 (Sunday)? – BusinessToday
Clipped from: https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/advance-tax-payment-what-happens-if-you-fail-to-pay-tax-on-december-15-sunday-can-you-pay-the-tax-on-dec-16-monday-456996-2024-12-11 To be compliant with tax regulations, individuals and businesses with a tax liability of Rs 10,000 or more in a financial year are
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Delhi HC Rules Reassessment Based on Insight Portal Information Must Be u/s 147/148, Not Section 153C
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reassessment-based-on-insight-portal-information-must-be-u-s-147-148-not-section-153c-delhi-hc-read-order/462724/ In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ruled that reassessment was initiated based on insight portal information so it must be under
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Reassessment u/s 147 After Issuance of Intimation u/s 143(1) – An Analysis of Conflicting Decisions – Taxmann
These would be cases where the return is accepted without scrutiny and no formal assessment is made.9 A perusal of the provisions clearly shows that
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Income Tax on Gifts from Relatives and Friends in India
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/qna-can-i-claim-income-tax-benefits-on-selling-gifted-jewellery-key-questions-on-gift-taxation-in-india-answered/463841/ A: Gifts from relatives are exempted from Tax in India. It is defined under section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act. Gifts from
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Analysis of Section 45(5A) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/analysis-section-455a-income-tax-act-1961.html SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR COMPUTATION OF CAPITAL GAINS IN CASE OF JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT [Section 45(5A)] Sub-section (5A) was inserted in section 45 with
FinMin reviews Income Tax Act! Tax certainty, simplified tax-filing process, better taxpayer services must be top reform agenda – Survey – Money News | The Financial Express
Clipped from: https://www.financialexpress.com/money/finmin-reviews-income-tax-act-survey-calls-for-tax-certainty-simplified-tax-filing-improved-taxpayer-services-3684059/?ref=money_hp As the finance ministry reviews the Income Tax Act, a Deloitte India survey shows that 94% of industry leaders prioritise simplifying tax laws,
👌👌👌Direct Tax Code 2025: Individuals earning Rs 5-15 lakh will be more benefitted once new tax laws in place, feel experts – Money News | The Financial Express
Clipped from: https://www.financialexpress.com/money/direct-tax-code-2025-individuals-earning-rs-5-15-lakh-will-be-more-benefitted-once-new-tax-laws-in-place-feel-experts-3683751/?ref=money_hp Direct Tax Code’s key provisions are expected to include streamlined tax regimes, fewer slabs, and reduced complexities, benefiting individuals with annual incomes between
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Re-opening of Assessment: dilemma of opinions!
Clipped from: https://database.taxsutra.com/articles/eceb7adb222b44360f06df5b8b5aa6/expert_article The assessment proceedings, completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“Act”), have to be conferred sanctity and any reopening of the
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Reopening assessment u/s. 147 void-ab-initio as issue already dealt in original assessment
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-u-s-147-void-ab-initio-issue-dealt-original-assessment.html DCIT Vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 on the issue which is already dealt
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Delhi HC Rules Reassessment Based on Insight Portal Information Must Be u/s 147/148, Not Section 153C
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reassessment-based-on-insight-portal-information-must-be-u-s-147-148-not-section-153c-delhi-hc-read-order/462724/ In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ruled that reassessment was initiated based on insight portal information so it must be under
👌👌👌Non-response to notice due to bonafide reasons justified hence matter remanded: Karnataka HC
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/non-response-notice-due-bonafide-reasons-justified-matter-remanded-karnataka-hc.html Varaha Builders Vs Hari Babu (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer since non-response to notice
👌👌👌👌👌Mere reporting in GST return doesn’t make amount taxable under Income Tax: ITAT Ahmedabad
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mere-reporting-gst-return-doesnt-amount-taxable-income-tax-itat-ahmedabad.html ITO Vs Aman Enterprise (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that mere reporting in the GST return doesn’t make the amount taxable as per
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Validity of Reopening Assessment Beyond Four-Year Limitation Period Hinges on Assessee’s Full Disclosure
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/validity-reopening-assessment-beyond-four-year-limitation-period-hinges-assessees-full-disclosure.html Prime Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening of assessment beyond four-year limitation period invalid if AO fails to establish failure on the part of
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Mere change of opinion cannot be a ground for reopening of assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mere-change-opinion-ground-reopening-assessment.html Konark Life Spaces Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Konark Life Spaces v. Assistant Commissioner of Income -Tax and Ors.
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌No further addition if no addition on the grounds for re-opening of assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-addition-grounds-re-opening-assessment.html PCIT CENTRAL -1 Vs Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court) In PCIT CENTRAL-1 Vs Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt Ltd, the Delhi
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Absence of Faceless Assessment Invalidates Section 148 notice: P&H HC
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/absence-faceless-assessment-invalidates-section-148-notice-ph-hc.html Vipin Kumar Gupta Vs ITO (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in the case of Vipin Kumar Gupta vs. ITO,
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Reopening assessment u/s. 147 void-ab-initio as issue already dealt in original assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-u-s-147-void-ab-initio-issue-dealt-original-assessment.html DCIT Vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 on the issue which is already dealt in
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Reassessment Proceeding initiated after 6 years is not valid; Department must prove dispatch of notice
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-proceeding-initiated-after-6-years-is-not-valid-department-must-prove-dispatch-of-notice.html M/s Ardent Steel Limited, Vs ACIT (Chhattisgarh High Court) A focused glance of the Section 149 provision would show that the maximum time limit
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌Reassessment after 4 years not valid If Assessee Made Full & True Disclosure during original assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-4-years-valid-assessee-full-true-disclosure-original-assessment.html Ranjana Aggarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) When the original assessment is completed u/s 143(3) and the reassessment proceedings have been initiated after a period
aniltikotekar4sme.com 