https://taxguru.in/income-tax/calcutta-hc-sets-aside-section-148ad-order-violation-natural-justice.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/calcutta-hc-sets-aside-section-148ad-order-violation-natural-justice.html Sushil Jaiswal Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) In the case of Sushil Jaiswal Vs Union of India, the Calcutta High
Category: Income Tax Cases
Failure to explain Credit Card Payments with Supporting Documentary Evidence: ITAT Deletes partial Addition
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/failure-to-explain-credit-card-payments-with-supporting-documentary-evidence-itat-deletes-partial-addition/302781/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Failure%20to%20explain%20Credit%20Card%20Payments%20with%20Supporting%20Documentary%20Evidence:%20ITAT%20Deletes%20partial%20Addition By Aparna. M – On July 23, 2023 11:30 am – 2 mins read The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad Bench held that the assessee failed to explain the credit
Issue of Notice u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act is mandatory requirement for framing reassessment order, not curable as per S.292BB Act:ITAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/issue-of-notice-u-s-1432-of-income-tax-act-is-mandatory-requirement-for-framing-reassessment-order-not-curable-as-per-s-292bb-act-itat/302795/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Issue%20of%20Notice%20u/s%20143(2)%20of%20Income%20Tax%20Act%20is%20mandatory%20requirement%20for%20framing%20reassessment%20order,%20not%20curable%20as%20per%20S.292BB%20Act:ITAT By Aparna. M – On July 23, 2023 12:30 pm – 2 mins read The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench ruled that issue of notice under Section 143(2) of
Invocation of extended period of limitation in absence of intention to evade duty is unsustainable
https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/invocation-extended-period-limitation-absence-intention-evade-duty-unsustainable.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/invocation-extended-period-limitation-absence-intention-evade-duty-unsustainable.html Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs Commissioner (Meghalaya High Court) Meghalaya High Court held that extended period of limitation as per proviso to section
Assessment Order passed in Violation of Natural Justice Principle: ITAT remands Matter to CIT(A)
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/assessment-order-passed-in-violation-of-natural-justice-principle-itat-remands-matter-to-cita/302340/ The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the appeal of an assessee and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner
👍👍👍👍👍Reopening of assessment u/s 148 for mere change of opinion is unsustainable
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/re-opening-assessment-u-s-148-mere-change-opinion-unsustainable.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/re-opening-assessment-u-s-148-mere-change-opinion-unsustainable.html Mukand Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court held re-opening of assessment under section 148 of the Income
Only Profit Element of Bogus Purchase can be Added to Taxable Income Under Income Tax Act when Assessee Reconciled the Stock: Bombay HC
Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/only-profit-element-of-bogus-purchase-can-be-added-to-taxable-income-under-income-tax-act-when-assessee-reconciled-the-stock-bombay-hc/301700/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/only-profit-element-of-bogus-purchase-can-be-added-to-taxable-income-under-income-tax-act-when-assessee-reconciled-the-stock-bombay-hc/301700/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Only%20Profit%20Element%20of%20Bogus%20Purchase%20can%20be%20Added%20to%20Taxable%20Income%20Under%20Income%20Tax%20Act%20when%20Assessee%20Reconciled%20the%20Stock:%20Bombay%20HC The Bombay High Court has held that only the profit element of a bogus purchase can be added to taxable income
Mere incorrect claims in ITR not amounts to concealment of income
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incorrect-claim-deduction-expenses-itr-amount-concealment-income-furnishing-inaccurate-particulars-itat-sets-nfac-order.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incorrect-claim-deduction-expenses-itr-amount-concealment-income-furnishing-inaccurate-particulars-itat-sets-nfac-order.html Kongnoli Sarva Seva Society Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Pune recently delivered an impactful ruling
Cash deposit against Sum received from mother-in-law – ITAT directs re-adjudication
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposit-sum-received-mother-in-law-itat-directs-re-adjudication.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposit-sum-received-mother-in-law-itat-directs-re-adjudication.html Pawanveer Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Delhi recently delivered a crucial order in the Pawanveer
TDS Mismatch in 26AS and Profit & Loss Account: ITAT Orders Reassessment on Lack of Substantiating Evidence
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/tds-mismatch-in-26as-and-profit-loss-account-itat-orders-reassessment-on-lack-of-substantiating-evidence/301323/ The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of Kolkata Bench has issued a directive for the reassessment of a case where there was a discrepancy between the
AO Fails to Follow Procedures to Proceed Reassessment Proceedings under Income Tax Act; issued notices to different PAN Number: ITAT quashes notice u/s 148
Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/ao-fails-to-follow-procedures-to-proceed-reassessment-proceedings-under-income-tax-act-issued-notices-to-different-pan-number-itat-quashes-notice-u-s-148/301078/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/ao-fails-to-follow-procedures-to-proceed-reassessment-proceedings-under-income-tax-act-issued-notices-to-different-pan-number-itat-quashes-notice-u-s-148/301078/ The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍यूट्यूबवरच्या कमाईवरही आता इन्कम टॅक्स विभागाचा डोळा; पै न् पैचा हिशेब ठेवा अन्यथा…| | Loksatta
https://www.loksatta.com/business/finance/the-income-tax-department-now-has-an-eye-on-youtube-earnings-keep-track-of-money-otherwise-vrd-88-3798765/ Clipped from: https://www.loksatta.com/business/finance/the-income-tax-department-now-has-an-eye-on-youtube-earnings-keep-track-of-money-otherwise-vrd-88-3798765/ तस्लीम नावाच्या यूट्यूबरच्या घरावर प्राप्तिकर विभागाने छापा टाकला. छाप्यात घरातून २४ लाखांची रोकड प्राप्तिकर विभागाकडून जप्त करण्यात आली आहे. यूट्यूबवरच्या कमाईवरही आता
Mere Chartered Accountant’s certificate without documentary evidence is not sufficient for duty treatment of obsolete stock
https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/mere-chartered-accountants-certificate-documentary-evidence-sufficient-duty-treatment-obsolete-stock.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/mere-chartered-accountants-certificate-documentary-evidence-sufficient-duty-treatment-obsolete-stock.html Owens Corning India Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai in the matter of obsolete stock usage vis-à-vis reversal
Rejection of books of accounts merely because of lower gross profit rate is unsustainable
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rejection-books-accounts-gross-profit-rate-unsustainable.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rejection-books-accounts-gross-profit-rate-unsustainable.html ACIT Vs Omshree Agrotech Private Ltd (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that rejection of books of accounts invoking provisions of section 145(3)
👍👍👍👍👍Reopening of assessment before disposing of objections filed by assessee is unsustainable
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-disposing-objections-filed-assessee-unsustainable.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-assessment-disposing-objections-filed-assessee-unsustainable.html General Electric Company Vs ADIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment prior to disposing of the objections filed by
Delay in Filing Appeal due to Medical Treatment: ITAT Condones Delay of 259 Days
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/delay-in-filing-appeal-due-to-medical-treatment-itat-condones-delay-of-259-days/299600/ The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that delay in filling appeal due to medical treatment and condones a delay of
Excess Stock and Excess Cash found during Survey Proceedings are recorded in Books of Account: ITAT Upholds surrendered income as Business Income
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/excess-stock-and-excess-cash-found-during-survey-proceedings-are-recorded-in-books-of-account-itat-upholds-surrendered-income-as-business-income/300751/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Excess%20Stock%20and%20Excess%20Cash%20found%20during%20Survey%20Proceedings%20are%20recorded%20in%20Books%20of%20Account:%20ITAT%20Upholds%20surrendered%20income%20as%20Business%20Income By Aparna. M – On July 17, 2023 5:30 pm – 2 mins read The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench while upholding the business income which surrendered after the
👍👍👍👍👍Reopening untenable in absence of tangible material concluding that income has escaped assessment
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-untenable-absence-tangible-material-concluding-income-escaped-assessment.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-untenable-absence-tangible-material-concluding-income-escaped-assessment.html Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment, in the exercise
Once income is shown the assessee has every right to get credit of TDS
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-shown-assessee-credit-tds.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-shown-assessee-credit-tds.html BAE Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc Vs ADIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that if the assessee has shown the
👍👍👍👍👍Unverified Information: ITAT upholds quashing of Re-assessment Order
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unverified-information-itat-upholds-quashing-re-assessment-order.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unverified-information-itat-upholds-quashing-re-assessment-order.html ITO Vs Tarik Tondon (ITAT Delhi) In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi upheld the order of the