Section 75(4) U.P. GST Act is Mandatory, Even if no Demand in Writing for Hearing is made out: Allahabad HC Quashes Order

Read More: https://www.taxscan.in/section-754-u-p-gst-act-is-mandatory-even-if-no-demand-in-writing-for-hearing-is-made-out-allahabad-hc-quashes-order/269641/ Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/section-754-u-p-gst-act-is-mandatory-even-if-no-demand-in-writing-for-hearing-is-made-out-allahabad-hc-quashes-order/269641/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Section%2075(4)%20U.P.%20GST%20Act%20is%20Mandatory,%20Even%20if%20no%20Demand%20in%20Writing%20for%20Hearing%20is%20made%20out:%20Allahabad%20HC%20Quashes%20Order By Aparna. M – On April 17, 2023 1:00 pm – 2 mins read In a significant case, the Allahabad High Court held that section

👍Restaurant Service Charge: Delhi HC stays guidelines that prohibited restaurants from levying service charges – The Economic Times

Clipped from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/hotels-/-restaurants/delhi-hc-stays-guidelines-that-prohibited-restaurants-and-hotels-from-levying-service-charges-on-food-bills/articleshow/92998278.cms Synopsis The CCPA guidelines issued on July 4 stated that no hotel or restaurant shall add service charge automatically or by default in

👍👍👍👍👍GST applicable on Voluntary Gratuitous Payment from Outgoing Members of Housing Cooperative Society: AAAR

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-applicable-on-voluntary-gratuitous-payment-from-outgoing-members-of-housing-cooperative-society-aaar/267143/?utm_campaign=Campaign+Name&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Newsletter The Maharashtra Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) has ruled that GST is payable on voluntary gratuitous payment from an outgoing member of

Accountant of Firm cannot be Considered as Representative of Taxable Person u/s 169(1)(a) GST Act: Allahabad HC quashes Notice Served

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/accountant-of-firm-cannot-be-considered-as-representative-of-taxable-person-u-s-1691a-gst-act-allahabad-hc-quashes-notice-served-read-order/266842/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Accountant%20of%20Firm%20cannot%20be%20Considered%20as%20Representative%20of%20Taxable%20Person%20u/s%20169(1)(a)%20GST%20Act:%20Allahabad%20HC%20quashes%20Notice%20Served The notice served was invalidated by a panel of the Allahabad High Court presided over by Justice Pankaj Bhatia because it was not

👍👍👍Residents Society collecting CAM charges for services provided to its resident members attracts GST: AAR

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/residents-society-collecting-cam-charges-for-services-provided-to-its-resident-members-attracts-gst-aar/266591/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Residents%20Society%20collecting%20CAM%20charges%20for%20services%20provided%20to%20its%20resident%20members%20attracts%20GST:%20AAR The Two-Member Bench of the Haryana Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) observed that the Residents Society collecting Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges for services provided

👍GST Not Applicable on Notice Pay Recovery from Outgoing Employee: AAR

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/gst-not-applicable-on-notice-pay-recovery-from-outgoing-employee-aar/266599/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=GST%20Not%20Applicable%20on%20Notice%20Pay%20Recovery%20from%20Outgoing%20Employee:%20AAR The Haryana Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), observed that GST is not applicable on Notice Pay Recovery from Outgoing Employee. RITES Limited, a Government of

👍Company Director forcibly taken to GST office to Deposit GST Demand: P&H HC orders to Refund Sum with Interest

Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/company-director-forcibly-taken-to-gst-office-to-deposit-gst-demand-ph-hc-orders-to-refund-sum-with-interest/266760/?utm_source=izooto&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=Company%20Director%20forcibly%20taken%20to%20GST%20office%20to%20Deposit%20GST%20Demand:%20P&H%20HC%20orders%20to%20Refund%20Sum%20with%20Interest In a recent decision, Judge Ritu Bahri and Justice Manish Batra of the Punjab and Haryana High Court bench concluded that the respondent had forced

1 35 36 37 38 39 190