👍👍👍👍👍GST: Provisional attachment must be on a genuine apprehension that taxpayer may evade liabilities

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-provisional-attachment-genuine-apprehension-taxpayer-evade-liabilities.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-provisional-attachment-genuine-apprehension-taxpayer-evade-liabilities.html Patil Construction & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner of State Tax & Ors. (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court held before powers under

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍Service of notice gets affected when sent to correct address by registered post

https://taxguru.in/company-law/service-notice-gets-affected-sent-correct-address-registered-post.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/company-law/service-notice-gets-affected-sent-correct-address-registered-post.html Mukund Rajhans Vs Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi) In the case of Mukund Rajhans vs. Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited, the National Company

Using GST as consumption proxy | Expert Views – Business Standard

https://www.business-standard.com/opinion/columns/using-gst-as-consumption-proxy-124060301158_1.html Clipped from: https://www.business-standard.com/opinion/columns/using-gst-as-consumption-proxy-124060301158_1.html Unlike private consumption data, GST can provide real-time insights into consumption patterns, economic activity, and state-wise variations Illustration: Binay Sinha Last financial

👍👍👍👍👍GSTR-2B vs GSTR-3B: Is Buyer Responsible for Supplier’s Conduct?

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-2b-vs-gstr-3b-buyer-responsibility-supplier-conduct.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-2b-vs-gstr-3b-buyer-responsibility-supplier-conduct.html GST has been prevailing in India since 1st July, 2017 constituted under article 246A of the Indian Constitution. Broadly, the prominent motive of

Interest allowable on delayed refunds of GST Input Tax Credit: Telangana HC

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-allowable-delayed-refunds-gst-input-tax-credit-telangana-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-allowable-delayed-refunds-gst-input-tax-credit-telangana-hc.html Qualcom India Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (ST)(FAC) and Ors. (Telangana High Court) Introduction: The Telangana High Court recently addressed the issue of

👍👍👍👍👍Delhi HC Invalidates GST Order for Lack of Consideration of Petitioner’s Reply

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-invalidates-gst-order-lack-of-consideration-petitioners-reply.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-invalidates-gst-order-lack-of-consideration-petitioners-reply.html RPJ Polymers Vs Union Of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) RPJ Polymers, the petitioner, challenged an order dated 28.12.2023 issued under

👍👍👍👍👍GST Assessment Order Invalid if Reply to Notice Ignored: Madras HC

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-invalid-reply-notice-ignored-madras-hc.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-invalid-reply-notice-ignored-madras-hc.html Imperial Shipping Service Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has set aside a

No record of service of notice or order: Bombay HC set aside GST Refund rejection order

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/record-service-notice-order-bombay-hc-set-aside-gst-refund-rejection-order.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/record-service-notice-order-bombay-hc-set-aside-gst-refund-rejection-order.html Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition

Assessee cannot be adjudicated by CGST, assigned to SGST authority or vice-versa

https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assessee-adjudicated-cgst-assigned-sgst-authority-vice-versa.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assessee-adjudicated-cgst-assigned-sgst-authority-vice-versa.html In a significant ruling, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Ram Agencies v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax  [W.P. (MD) NO.

1 12 13 14 15 16 189