The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune on February 19, 2026 gave full tax exemption to Mr Gugale from Baramati, Pune after he sold his land for Rs 3.21 and used this money to buy a house. He had to go and file a case in ITAT Pune as the Income Tax Department had initially denied his tax exemption claim under Section 54F because he made a crucial technical mistake of not fully depositing the land’s sale proceeds in a special bank account called ‘Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS)’ before filing his income tax return (ITR).
Income Tax Guide
Income Tax Union Budget FY 2026-27 LiveIncome Tax Slabs FY 2025-26Income Tax Calculator 2025
ITAT Pune held that Section 54F exemption cannot be denied when sale proceeds are fully invested in a house, even if not fully deposited in the capital gains account before filing the return. The Karnataka High Court reached the same conclusion in a similar case (case no: CIT vs. Ramchandra Rao [2015] 56 taxman.com 163).
Mihir Tanna, Associate Director, S.K Patodia says that if a particular taxpayer wants to claim tax exemptions on transfer/sale of any long term capital asset like house property/land, he/she can invest in another residential house property using the resultant capital gains by the due date of filing ITR.
Tanna says: “However, in many cases the time needed to reinvest in another house property exceeds the due date for filing income tax return (ITR). In such cases, taxpayers take shelter of CGAS scheme wherein he/she can deposit the unutilised capital gains in a Capital Gains Account under CGAS to remain eligible for the tax exemption.”
Also read: Lady sells listed equity shares for Rs 26 crore and constructs house, pays no capital gains tax; ITAT Kolkata rules in her favour
|
Upgrade to ETPrime for expert insights & exclusive stories
Special Offer ends in 00 : 04 : 04
1M+ Subscribers Trust ETPrime • 60k Joined Today
What does Section 54F capital gains tax exemption say and when is CGAS used?
Chartered Accountant Suresh Surana says that Section 54F allows individual and HUF taxpayers to save tax on capital gains arising from the sale of a long-term capital asset, other than a residential property, by investing the gains in a new residential property.
Thus, the gains derived from selling one’s stake in a company can be claimed as exemption u/s 54F provided such gains are long term in nature and the amount of net consideration received is invested in accordance with the provisions of S. 54F as mentioned below:
- Such new house property should be purchased within a period of 1 year before or 2 years after the date of transfer of old house or should be constructed within a period of 3 years from the date of transfer of the old house. Section 54(F) provides that if the net consideration is not fully used for purchase or construction of a residential house before filing the ITR, the unutilised amount must be deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme on or before the due date under Section 139(1), and proof of such deposit must be furnished along with the return.
- The assesse should not transfer the newly acquired asset for a period of 3 years from the date of acquisition or construction. In case of any such transfer or conversion made, the exempted gains would be subjected to tax in the year of such transfer or conversion.
- Assessee should not own more than one Residential House Property on the date of transfer/sale of the capital asset
- During the period of 2/3 Years, the assessee must not purchase/construct any other house property
The Capital Gains Tax Exemption Calculation u/s 54F would be as follows:
Capital Gains x Investment in New Residential Property/Net Sale Consideration
Herein, the net sale consideration is the amount received from the sale of the capital asset after deducting any expenses related to the sale.
Also read: Lady sells property for Rs 94 lakh, gets Rs 38 lakh in cash; files no ITR, gets tax notice for unexplained income, wins case in ITAT Mumbai
Background details of the plot
On March 18, 2024, Mr Gugale had sold a plot for Rs 3.21 crore. On January 23, 2015, Mr Gugale had filed his income tax return (ITR) declaring an income of Rs 17 lakh. On February 25, 2015, he purchased a house for Rs 4 crore and claimed Section 54F tax exemption on capital gains arising out of the sale of the land.
Subsequently at the time of processing his ITR, the tax department first selected his case for scrutiny through CASS and then two tax notices were issued to him under Section 143(2) and 142(1) respectively.
The tax department had an issue with the way Mr Gugale sold the land and then purchased the new house. The Income Tax Assessing Officer found that Gugale had failed to deposit the whole of the sale consideration from the land into a specified capital gain account scheme (CGAS) account before furnishing his ITR. Gugale should have deposited the full Rs 3.21 crore but deposited only Rs 2.25 crore in the specified bank account (CGAS).
Therefore, the Assessing Officer calculated Gugale’s capital gain at Rs 91.45 lakh (Rs 3,16,45,450 minus Rs 2,25,00,000) being the balance of capital gain not deposited in specified bank account (CGAS) before furnishing the ITR.
Ultimately when the tax assessing officer finished his assessment of Gugale’s income, he determined Gugale’s income at Rs 1.0863 crore instead of Rs 17 lakh which Gugale himself assessed and declared in his ITR. The tax officer’s assessed income includes addition of Rs 91.45 lakh as capital gain being disallowance of deduction under Section 54F.
Feeling aggrieved by such a big amount of income tax, Gugale filed a case against the tax department. ITAT Pune heard the case on December 23, 2025 and gave its judgement in Gugale’s favour on February 19, 2026. Mr Neelesh Khandelwal represented Gugale in ITAT Pune.
Read below to know how Gugale won this tax case and thus paid no income tax on selling his land for Rs 3.21 crore.
Summary of the judgement
Chartered Accountant Suresh Surana said to ET Wealth Online that in the given case (ITO ITA No.1821/PUN/2025), the assessee, an individual, had filed his ITR for Assessment Year 2014–15 declaring total income of Rs 17,18,490.
During the relevant financial year, the assessee sold a plot of land for a consideration of Rs. 3,21,00,000 on 18 March 2014. Subsequently, on 25 February 2015, he purchased a residential flat for Rs. 4 crores and claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IT Act’) in respect of the capital gains arising from the said transfer.
However, while filing the ITR, the assessee had deposited only Rs 2,25,00,000 in the Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS) and did not deposit the balance amount of Rs 91,45,450 prior to the due date under Section 139(1).
The Assessing Officer (AO) held that since the entire net consideration was not deposited in the specified Capital Gains Account Scheme before furnishing the return of income, the assessee was not eligible for deduction to the extent of Rs. 91,45,450 and accordingly taxed the same as long-term capital gains.
The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) determining the total income at Rs. 1,08,63,940. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/NFAC upheld the disallowance, following which the assessee preferred an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune.
The Tribunal examined the provisions of Section 54F, particularly sub-section (4), which mandates deposit of unutilised consideration in the Capital Gains Account Scheme where the amount is not appropriated towards purchase or construction of a residential house before the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal noted that, in the given case, the assessee had invested the entire sale consideration of Rs. 3,21,00,000 in purchase of a residential flat within the prescribed period of one year from the date of transfer of the original asset.
Relying on the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in CIT v. K. Ramachandra Rao (2015) 56 taxmann.com 163, the Tribunal observed that Section 54F(4) is attracted only in situations where the assessee retains the capital gains without utilising them for purchase or construction within the stipulated period.
If the entire consideration is actually invested in acquisition or construction of a residential house within the time prescribed under Section 54F(1), non-deposit in the Capital Gains Account Scheme would not disentitle the assessee from claiming exemption.
The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent of Section 54F is to ensure reinvestment of capital gains in a residential house and not merely to mandate procedural compliance of deposit where substantive investment has already been made. Since the assessee had fully invested the net consideration within the statutory time frame, the substantive conditions of Section 54F stood satisfied.
Surana says: “Accordingly, the ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction of Rs. 91,45,450 under Section 54F. The alternate ground relating to violation of principles of natural justice was rendered infructuous. Thus, the appeal of the assessee was allowed in favour of the taxpayer.”
ITAT Pune analysis and discussion
Judicial member Vinay Bhamore and accountant member Manish Borad of ITAT Pune bench B gave their judgement of this case (no. 1821/PUN/2025) on February 19, 2026.
Karnataka High Court precedent already exists
Mr Neelesh Khandelwal who represented Gugale (land seller) in ITAT Pune argued that since the whole of the sale consideration from sale of the land (Rs 3.21 crore) has already been invested within one year from the sale of the original asset (land), in purchase of residential flat valuing for Rs 4 crore, the real intention of the legislature is fulfilled and the deduction under Section 54F needs to be allowed.
In this regard, Neelesh Khandelwal relied on a judgement passed by the High Court of Karnataka in the case of CIT vs. Ramchandra Rao [2015] 56 taxman.com 163 (Karnataka) and also relied on various decisions passed by coordinate benches of this Tribunal wherein tax deduction under 54F was allowed to the assessee under identical facts.
In this regard, ITAT Pune said that they find that the Karnataka High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department and confirmed the order passed by the Tribunal wherein deduction under Section 54F was allowed to the assessee even in the absence of depositing the whole of the consideration in specified capital gain account scheme.
ITAT Pune applies Karnataka High Court judgement in this case
ITAT Pune said that they respectfully apply the decision passed by Karnataka High Court in the case of K. Ramchandra Rao, as ITAT Pune is of the considered opinion that the real intention of the legislature is to get the amount of sale consideration invested in purchase of residential house within the prescribed period and not to get the amount deposited in capital gain accounts scheme.
ITAT Pune said: “Admittedly, in the instant case the whole of the sale consideration was invested by the assessee in purchase of residential house within a period of one year from the date of sale of original asset therefore in the light of above judgement passed by Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of K. Ramchandra Rao, the assessee is entitled to get deduction under Section 54F.”
Judgement:
- Accordingly, in view of the above discussion, we set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC and direct the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of Rs.91,45,450/- claimed by the assessee u/s 54F of the IT Act. Thus, the ground no.2 raised by the assessee is allowed. Since alternate ground no.2 has been allowed, ground no.1 becomes infructuous and is therefore not adjudicated.
- In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on this 19th day of February, 2026.
aniltikotekar4sme.com 