Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/why-ca-cannot-issue-gst-clearance-certificate-in-service-tenders-insights-from-bombay-hc-order-1440666?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307259 A GST clearance certificate in service tenders must come from the GST Department, as a Chartered Accountant has no statutory authority to certify
Day: December 30, 2025
CBIC Circular on GSTR-2A vs 3B ITC Difference Ignored by GST Dept: Karnataka HC sets aside orders [Read Order]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/cbic-circular-on-gstr-2a-vs-3b-itc-difference-ignored-by-gst-dept-karnataka-hc-sets-aside-orders-1439928?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307226 ITC cannot be disallowed merely on the basis of GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B differences without following the CBIC-mandated procedure. The Karnataka High Court has
ITC Claimed, Reversed and Re-Claimed in FY 2024-25: How Will It Reflect in GSTR-9? [GSTR 9/9C FAQ Explained]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/itc-claimed-reversed-and-re-claimed-in-fy-2024-25-how-will-it-reflect-in-gstr-9-gstr-99c-faq-explained-1440278?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307256 To prevent mismatches, audit objections, and future disputes consistent and proper reporting across these tables is essential. In this article, we’ll explain the
*******Deduction u/s 54F Cannot be Denied for Non-Deposit of Sale Proceeds Before Filing Return: ITAT [Read Order]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/deduction-us-f-cannot-be-denied-for-non-deposit-of-sale-proceeds-before-filing-return-itat-1434395?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307251 The Tribunal observed that courts have consistently held such deposits to be procedural and that the main condition under Section 54 investment in
Wife Sells Two Gifted Flats for ₹6 Crore and Pays No Income Tax: Here’s How
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/wife-sells-two-gifted-flats-for-6-crore-and-pays-no-income-tax-heres-how-1428872?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307244 A Mumbai woman sells two gifted flats for Rs. 6 crore, reinvests the proceeds in another home, and legally avoids paying any tax
Sale of Late Mother’s Flat for Multiple Residential Houses eligible for Income Tax S.54 Exemption: Bombay HC [Read Order]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/sale-of-late-mothers-flat-for-multiple-residential-houses-eligible-for-income-tax-s54-exemption-bombay-hc-1429946?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307229 The Assessing Officer had denied the Section 54 exemption and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed relief for only one unit.
Meals, Transport & Courier Expenses not Part of “Transfer of House Property”: ITAT Rejects NRI’s Income Tax Deduction Claims [Read Order]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/meals-transport-courier-expenses-not-part-of-transfer-of-house-property-itat-rejects-nris-income-tax-deduction-claims-1437543?TRN300=SekwjRcdsAuMKvsgUYkMcbgwAcJuwuMkvcGUykqhGJxMEdFSIMSBJiuRKMsAsx&LKD333=3307239 The assessee claimed that several travel-related and incidental expenses were incurred exclusively for completing the sale of his Bengaluru property The Bengaluru Bench of the
Tribunal reversing order of CIT(A) without demonstrating any perversity is not justifiable
lipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tribunal-reversing-order-cita-demonstrating-perversity-justifiable.html Rajnandani Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Patna High Court) Patna High Court held that ITAT was not justified in reversing the order of
Excess trade advance received back in cash cannot be added u/s. 68 as unexplained cash credit
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/excess-trade-advance-received-cash-added-u-s-68-unexplained-cash-credit.html Lalitha Padmaja Thallapalli Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that trade advance given to goldsmith for making gold jewellery and excess amount
Assessment u/s. 143(3) quashed as being in violation of provisions of section 144B
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/assessment-u-s-1433-quashed-violation-provisions-section-144b.html Optical Health Solutions Private Limited Vs Union of India (Telangana High Court) Telangana High Court held that initiation of proceedings under section 143(3)
aniltikotekar4sme.com 