Clipped from: https://www.financialexpress.com/policy/economy-100-tariff-on-brics-countries-if-dollar-countered-trump-3681389/
Move couter-productive, impractical, say experts.
100% tariff on BRICS countries if dollar countered: Trump. (Image: Getty)
US President-electтАЩs Donald Trump has threatened nine country BRICS bloc with 100% tariffs if they went ahead the plan to counter US dollarтАЩs prominence in global transactions as a reserve currency, by creating alternatives.
Trade experts, however, called the move not only counter-productive, but also impractical.┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а
India┬аis key member of BRICS along with Brazil, Russia, China, South Africa, Ira, Egypt, Ethiopia and the UAE.
BRICS nations are making an attempt to create either new currency like euro or back some other emerging ones to gradually replace the US dollar.
Trump had called India a tariff king earlier, but this is the first time he indicated about any adverse tariff action against New Delhi after being elected as the 47th president of the US.┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а
DollarтАЩs dominance is one of the key impediment for emerging┬аmarket┬аeconomies, as they seek to enhance their share in world trade and tilt the economic gains from trade in goods and services, as well as capital flows, in their favour.┬а┬а┬а┬а┬а
Last week, IndiaтАЩs commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal had allayed the fears about the adverse implications of TrumpтАЩs protectionist policies for India, citing the strong and growing ties between the two countries under prime minister Narendra Modi.
┬аThe latest threat was delivered by Trump through a social media post and like similar threats he had issued to China, Canada and Mexico. Trump justifies the moves by quoting the USтАЩs status as worldтАЩs biggest importer тАУ inward shipments of the country stood at $ 3.17 trillion in 2023.
тАЬTrumpтАЩs threat to impose 100% tariffs on countries adopting a BRICS currency is unrealistic and more symbolic than practical. Tariffs of this scale would harm US consumers by raising prices on imports, disrupt global trade, and risk retaliation from key trading partners,тАЭ founder of Global Trade Research Initiative Ajay Srivastava said.
The nine-nation grouping of which India is a founding member in its 16th Summit at Kazan in Russia last month the push was provided to the idea of trade settlement among members in local currencies. The members called for strengthening of correspondent banking networks within BRICS and enabling settlements in local currencies in line with BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative (BCBPI). Something concrete may emerge after further discussions in the coming months, officials had said after the summit..
While the US dollar dominates global trade accounting for 90% of the transactions, other convertible currencies like Japanese yen, euro and British pound too are integral to global commerce. тАЬThe United States has not objected to their use. The proposed BRICS currency is simply an extension of these existing alternatives, aiming to facilitate trade among member countries and reduce over-reliance on a single currency.тАЭ Srivstava said.
It is the USтАЩ action that forced countries to look at alternatives to the dollar. The US has the history of leveraging its influence over global financial systems such as the SWIFT network for imposing unilateral sanctions.┬а
SWIFTтАФthe Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial TelecommunicationтАФis essential for secure and standardized international financial transactions. тАЬBy blocking countries like Russia and Iran from accessing SWIFT, the US has effectively weaponized the global financial infrastructure, forcing other nations to find alternative payment mechanisms to continue legitimate trade,тАЭ he said.
It was after Russia was disconnected from SWIFT after the start of its war on Ukraine that the Reserve┬аBank of India┬а(RBI) came up with a circular allowing invoicing and payment of international trade transactions in rupees.┬а┬а
Around 20 Authorised Dealer (AD) banks in India have been permitted to open 92 Special Rupee Vostro Accounts of partner banks from over 22 countries to facilitate this trade.
According to GTRIтАЩs Srivastava imposing a 100% tariff on BRICS countries could backfire economically. тАЬImports into the US would simply shift to third countries, potentially increasing costs for American consumers without bringing manufacturing┬аjobs┬аback home. The US has become less competitive in manufacturing labor-intensive goods due to higher production costs, and tariffs are unlikely to reverse this trend,тАЭ he said
Additionally, the global shift away from the US dollar is a complex process driven by economic diversification, not easily deterred by threats. Such rhetoric ignores the interdependence of global economies and oversimplifies the challenges in enforcing such drastic measures, Srivastava said.