https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/banks-overall-profit-in-q4fy24-could-be-buoyed-by-treasury-gains/article68003078.ece Clipped from: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/banks-overall-profit-in-q4fy24-could-be-buoyed-by-treasury-gains/article68003078.ece Yield of the benchmark 10-year G-Sec softened to end about 12 basis points lower in Q4 FY24 has ended on a positive
Day: March 28, 2024
*****Low wheat stocks manageable; paddy surplus a concern – The Hindu BusinessLine
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/editorial/low-wheat-stocks-manageable-paddy-surplus-a-concern/article67998511.ece Clipped from: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/editorial/low-wheat-stocks-manageable-paddy-surplus-a-concern/article67998511.ece A good north Indian winter has raised the prospects of wheat crop There is no cause for panic over the fact that
*****Detailed Analysis on Section 43B(h)
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/detailed-analysis-section-43b-h.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/detailed-analysis-section-43b-h.html Garima Agarwal 27 Mar 2024 984 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Articles Introduction:- In accordance with the amendment to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, a
ITAT directs CIT(A) to Condone 857-Day Delay considering change in residence & age
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-directs-cita-condone-857-day-delay-considering-change-residence-age.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-directs-cita-condone-857-day-delay-considering-change-residence-age.html CA Sandeep Kanoi 27 Mar 2024 114 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Judiciary Case Law Details Case Name : C. Ramasamy Gounder HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Appeal
Madras HC directs AO to readjudicate as CA was unable to represent client during Covid
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-directs-ao-readjudicate-ca-unable-represent-client-covid.html lipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-directs-ao-readjudicate-ca-unable-represent-client-covid.html CA Sandeep Kanoi 27 Mar 2024 87 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Judiciary Case Law Details Case Name : Pallazzio Energy Farms LLP Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)
AO cannot reject a reply by merely stating that reply was unsatisfactory
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ao-reject-reply-merely-stating-reply-unsatisfactory.html Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ao-reject-reply-merely-stating-reply-unsatisfactory.html CA Sandeep Kanoi 27 Mar 2024 2,814 Views 0 comment Print Goods and Services Tax | Judiciary Case Law Details Case Name : Ethos Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner Department of
aniltikotekar4sme.com 