*****US-based son gets tax notice in India over Rs 11 lakh cash deposit made on behalf of parents during demonetisation; ITAT Delhi cancels notice for this reason – The Economic Times

Clipped from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/tax/us-based-son-gets-tax-notice-in-india-over-rs-11-lakh-cash-deposit-made-on-behalf-of-parents-during-demonetisation-itat-delhi-cancels-notice-for-this-reason/articleshow/130755461.cms When Mr Bussi deposited about Rs 11 lakh cash into his parents’ ICICI Bank account in Delhi during demonetisation, he had no idea that he

*Rs 13 lakh cash payment for credit card bill triggers tax notice; man wins case after ITAT accepts ‘family gift’ explanation – The Economic Times

Clipped from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/tax/rs-13-lakh-cash-payment-for-credit-card-bill-triggers-tax-notice-man-wins-case-after-itat-accepts-family-gift-explanation/articleshow/130631512.cms When Mr Mehta from Shivaji Park, Mumbai, Maharashtra filed his income tax return (ITR), showing an income of Rs 6.3 lakh after paying

*Rs 1 crore gold seized from taxpayer in income tax search with no purchase bills — can it be taxed? ITAT ruling explains – Money News | The Financial Express

Clipped from: https://www.financialexpress.com/money/rs-1-crore-gold-seized-from-taxpayer-during-search-with-no-purchase-bills-can-it-be-taxed-itat-ruling-explains-4222161/ Gold found in an Income Tax search isn’t always taxable. A recent ITAT ruling shows how CBDT’s jewellery limits can help taxpayers avoid

ITR filing not required: Income Tax Act 2025 allows these taxpayers to use Form 125 — check eligibility – Money News | The Financial Express

Clipped from: https://www.financialexpress.com/money/itr-filing-not-required-income-tax-act-2025-allows-these-taxpayers-to-use-form-125-check-eligibility-4219521/?ref=hometop_hp Senior citizens aged 75+ with only pension and interest income can now avoid filing ITR using Form No. 125 under the new Income-tax

*Who has the authority to issue tax notices ? [2] Section 151A – mandates ” faceless ” assessments, but many notices are still being issued by jurisdictional [physical] officers rather than the centralized faceless unit [3] Against this background, the tax department has now defined [ Section 147 A] Assessing Officer as someone other than the National Faceless Assessment Center– [4] and that has a retrospective effect [5] Constitutional scrutiny of this retrospective amendment– relating to jurisdiction — is likely to be tested in various high courts — Courtesy BusinessLine

1 4 5 6 7 8 172