ECLGS has kept small firms going amidst Covid. Its role should be expanded
Preliminary studies suggest that the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) unveiled in May 2020 has worked as a lifeline for lakhs of MSMEs, particularly the ‘micro’ and ‘small’ units ( turnover below ₹5 crore and ₹50 crore, respectively), in the wake of the pandemic. Unlike most similar credit initiatives for MSMEs, which have ended up serving the top end of this segment, the ECLGS — a scheme that ‘guarantees’ a top-up loan up to 20 per cent of the outstandings — seems to have broken through that barrier. The question, is to what extent.
This ties in with SBI Research’s finding that ECLGS has rescued 13.5 lakh MSME accounts, 93.7 per cent in the micro and small categories (defined in turnover terms). Not surprisingly, it says that private companies rather than proprietorships are the main beneficiaries. Clearly, the ECLGS has a lot going for it, and should be extended beyond March, given the ongoing third Covid wave. This will preserve jobs in the contact-intensive sectors and boost growth. The scheme has arguably been the most successful MSME credit scheme in recent times. It has lifted credit flows to MSMEs, which were muted despite a credit guarantee scheme (CGTSME) being in existence since 2000. The positives of ECLGS should be incorporated into CGSTME, which includes waiving processing and guarantee fees. ECLGS has also worked due to formalisation of the economy. Meanwhile, other financial vehicles, in keeping with the advance of technology, need to be explored. As the 2019 RBI expert panel report on MSMEs has suggested, a ‘fund of funds platform’ under SIDBI can be created to advance venture capital finance. For now, a freeze in inter-firm credit as a result of low business confidence has impacted working capital flows. The RBI should address this problem while improving its MSME outreach.