Category: Income Tax
*******Bombay HC Quashes Reassessment Citing Change of Opinion, No Failure to Disclose
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/bombay-hc-quashes-income-tax-reassessment-over-change-of-opinion-and-no-failure-to-disclose-facts/504935/ The High Court of Bombay, quashed an income tax reassessment proceedings initiated against the assessee for Assessment Year(AY) 2014–15, holding that the reopening was
*******No Tax on Redevelopment Flats u/s 56(2)(x) of Income Tax Act: ITAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/no-tax-on-redevelopment-flats-u-s-x-of-income-tax-act-itat/504748/?utm_source=signinbutton&utm_medium=txn&utm_campaign=checkoutsigninbtn Top Stories Receiving a new flat in place of an old one is a case of ‘extinguishment’ of property rights rather than an
*******Addition under Faceless Assessment Scheme without issuance of notice not sustainable
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-faceless-assessment-scheme-issuance-notice-sustainable.html Saurabh Rohitbhai Modi HUF Vs Addl/Joint/DY./ACIT/ITO National Faceless Assessment Centre or His Successor & Anr. (Gujarat High Court) Gujarat High Court held that addition without
*******Time period for Issue of section 148 notice wef 1.4.2021
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/time-period-issue-section-148-notice-wef-1-4-2021.html?utm_source=perplexity Time period for issuance of notice under section 148 under new regime wef 1.4.2021. As per substituted section 149 wef 1.4.2021 As per
*******Mere Change of Opinion Can’t Justify Reopening of an Assessment: ITAT
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/reassessment-u-s-147-on-mere-change-of-opinion-invalid-itat/504240/ In a recent judgement, the Raipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that reassessment cannot be done based on a mere change
Over 26,000 Income Tax Appeals Filed Electronically via ITAT E-Filing Portal: PIB
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/over-26000-income-tax-appeals-filed-electronically-via-itat-e-filing-portal-pib/504287/ Top Stories This Information was given by the Arjun Ram Meghwal in a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha By Franklin
15 days minimum time to be given to respond to hearing notices: ITAT Pune
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/15-days-minimum-time-respond-hearing-notices-itat-pune.html Dnyanagan Education Society Vs CIT Exemption (ITAT Pune) Dnyanagan Education Society, a trust, applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax
@ITAT Rules Step-Siblings Are ‘Relative’, Gift Received Not Taxable u/s 56(2) of Income Tax
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/step-siblings-included-in-relative-definition-gift-received-not-taxable-u-s-of-income-tax-itat/501493/ Top Stories The ITAT held that a gift received from a step-sister qualifies as exempt under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act,
*******Sending Notices Merely by Mail is Denial of Hearing Opportunity: ITAT Bangalore
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sending-notices-mail-denial-hearing-opportunity-itat-bangalore.html Heggur Nanjundappa Vishwanath Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the case of Heggur Nanjundappa Vishwanath Vs The Income Tax Officer, Circle – 7(1)(1), Bengaluru,
Income Tax Proceedings against Deceased Person Invalid, must be Initiated against Legal Heirs u/s 159: Bombay HC [Read Order]
Clipped from: https://www.taxscan.in/income-tax-proceedings-against-deceased-person-invalid-must-be-initiated-against-legal-heirs-u-s-bombay-hc/499147/ Top Stories Bombay HC quashes tax proceedings against deceased, rules notices must be issued to legal heirs under Section 159 of the Income
@Tolani Shipping Co.Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cir 5(3), Mumbai on 31 March, 2023
We find that the benefit of indexation while computing long term capital gains had been statutorily provided to the assessee. Hence, in view of the
