Clipped from: https://www.business-standard.com/opinion/columns/why-climate-change-makes-gdp-unsuitable-for-measuring-economic-churn-123041400852_1.html GDP does not capture issues like welfare, inequality and human development. Nor does GDP capture the damage to the environment caused by economic
Category: Five Star
👍👍👍👍👍Proceedings initiated & orders passed in the name of dead person is invalid
lipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/proceedings-initiated-orders-passed-name-dead-person-invalid.html Parmanand Jamnadas Kapadia (Legal Heir Mr. Harit P. Kapadia) Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Admittedly notice under section 148 has been issued and also
👍👍👍👍👍सहकारी संस्थांचा निधी गुंतविताना – सहकारी संस्थांचा निधी गुंतविताना – Maharashtra Times
Clipped from: https://maharashtratimes.com/-/articleshow/6876748.cms सहकारी संस्थांचा निधी गुंतविताना काय काळजी घ्यावी याबाबतचे मार्गदर्शन. निधींचा विनियोग ADV- अप्लायन्स अपग्रेड दिवस- सर्वाधिक विक्री होणाऱ्या एसी आणि रेफ्रिजरेटरवर 50% पर्यंत
👍👍👍Denial of exemption u/s 80P of Income Tax Act just because of belated filing of return not justifiable
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/denial-exemption-u-s-80p-income-tax-act-because-belated-filing-return-justifiable.html Ambaradi Seva Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Vs DCIT (CPC) (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Rajkot held that denying the exemption under Section 80P of the Income
👍👍👍Orders passed without affording adequate personal hearing are quashed for fresh consideration
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/orders-passed-affording-adequate-personal-hearing-quashed-fresh-consideration.html Murugan Electrical Stores Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that as the personal hearing has not been
👍👍👍GST: Granting of personal hearing mandatory where an adverse decision is taken by AO
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/granting-personal-hearing-per-section-754-mandatory-adverse-decision-taken-by-ao.html Gayathri Agencies Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that as per provisions of section 75(4) of the GST
👍👍👍👍👍Motor Accident Claim: Tyre Burst is not an ‘Act of God’ & Insurance Company is liable to pay Compensation
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/motor-accident-claim-tyre-burst-act-god-insurance-company-liable-pay-compensation.html New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt. Mrunal Makarand Patwardhan (Bombay High Court) It is common knowledge that the Insurance Companies do not
👍👍👍👍👍Resolution Professional can take Control Of Corporate Debtor’s Rights In Assets Licensed To Third Parties: SC
lipped from: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/resolution-professional-control-corporate-debtors-rights-assets-licensed-third-parties-sc.html Victory Iron Works Ltd. Vs Jitendra Lohia (Supreme Court of India) The main ground of attack of the appellants to the impugned orders
👍👍👍👍Accident claim compensation to be calculated on gross salary after deducting professional tax
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/accident-claim-compensation-calculated-gross-salary-deducting-professional-tax.html V. Ramraj & Anr Vs New India Assurance Company Ltd. Anr (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court held that in case of accident
👍👍👍👍👍HC set aside Section 148A(d) order passed without considering reply
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hc-set-aside-section-148ad-order-passed-considering-reply.html Ashok Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) According to the petitioner, although the amount of alleged bogus purchase bills has been quantified
👍👍👍👍👍Without Suppression of Facts or Fraud Extended Period of Limitation cannot be invoked
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/suppression-facts-fraud-extended-period-limitation-invoked.html Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) CESTAT find force in the submissions made by
👍👍👍👍👍Attested copies should be considered as proof of production of document as original documents misplaced
lipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/attested-copies-considered-proof-production-document-original-documents-misplaced.html Wns Global Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that refund claim was rejected on sole ground of non-production
👍👍👍👍👍HC quashes service tax notices issued after lapse of 10 years
Clipped from: https://taxguru.in/service-tax/hc-quashes-service-tax-notices-issued-lapse-10-years.html Satish Ch. Das & Co. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Orissa High Court) 1. Both the petitions have been filed by
