NCLAT strikes down the word тАШprovisionalтАЩ used in imposition of penalty in the CCI order
In what is seen as a big relief for Google, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruling issued on Wednesday in the Android case has confirmed that the provisional penalty of тВ╣1,338 crore levied by CCI on the tech giant is the final.
Having held that the penalty imposed on Google as final, the NCLAT Bench comprising Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, and Alok Srivastava, ruled in its 189-page order that the penalty would not be subject to any revision upon Google furnishing any further financial details and supporting documents, as sought by┬аCCI┬аvide its order September 19, 2022.
It maybe recalled that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had, on October 20 last year in the Android ruling,┬аimposed a provisional┬аpenalty on Google, citing non-furnishing of full financial details by Google.┬а
In the wake of Google not providing the full set of financial information as sought by the CCI vide its order dated October 6, 2021 and reiterated in its later order dated October 17, 2021, the CCI had carried out the тАЬbest estimationтАЭ on the basis of financial statements and information submitted by Google.┬а┬аThis approach of CCIтАФ to quantify the monetary penalties on the basis of data presented by Google тАФhas now been endorsed by NCLAT.
In doing so, NCLAT also noted that the CCI had┬а┬аconsidered the lower of the two figures, from between тВ╣ 19,904 crores which is the sum total of various segments/heads of Google business in India for FY 2020-2021 and тВ╣ 16742 Crores, which is its total revenue from entire business from Indian operations for the FY 2020-21. тАЬThus, in a conservative approach, the CCI has taken the lower of these two figures as turnover for the FY 2020-2021 and imposed a penalty @ 10% of its average ofrelevant turnover for the last three FYs 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-2021. We uphold the amount of penalty imposed by CCI on GoogleтАЭ, the NCLAT said in its 189-page order.
Also read: Competition law: NCLAT ruling on effects analysis leaves CCI in a fix
On the issue of тАЬprovisional penaltyтАЭ, the NCLAT Bench noted that once the CCI has derived the тАЬbest estimateтАЭ of the relevant turnover for the last three preceding financial years, and imposed a penalty of 10 percent of the average of such turnover, there is no need for┬а┬аfurther revision of this penalty on the basis of financial information or data that may come to light in future and any such further revision┬а┬аwill not be in keeping with law.┬а
NCLAT therefore deleted the word тАШprovisionalтАЩ used in imposition of penalty in the entire CCI Order.
Commenting on the NCLAT ruling on the aspect of тАЬprovisionalтАЭ penalty, a lawyer representing Startups on condition of anonymity said тАЬIt is indeed strange that NCLAT has condoned the brazen non-compliance, rather defiance, of regulatory direction to Google to present its full and true financial details, which were critically required to compute the penalities. The ruling by interdicting the pending proces before CCI to gather full details,┬а┬аhas virtually incentivized┬а┬аnon-compliance and thereby┬а┬аenabled Google to hide its true financials which could have led to massive upward revision in penaltyтАЭ.
Chandni Chawla, Associate Partner, Phoenix Legal , said тАЬWhile upholding the provisional penalty levied by CCI on Google as final, the NCLAT has dwelled into the rationale of relevant turnover as provided in the landmark decision of Excel Corp. Care.
The NCLAT has analysed what will be considered to be relevant turnover in case of a тАЬdigital platformтАЭ such as Google and has observed that in case of OS based mobile devices the revenue streams of different apps cannot be isolated and distinguished but are in fact interwoven and accordingly have held that the entire ecosystem of Google sitting on the Android OS becomes a source of revenue and therefore revenue from all the apps will become relevant turnoverтАЭ.
Comments
aniltikotekar4sme.com 